Fiona
Bruce MP leads on amendment to Serious Crime Bill to outlaw sex-selective
abortion
Almost 80 MPs
have tabled an amendment to the Serious Crime Bill.
Fiona Bruce has
tabled a parliamentary amendment to the Serious Crime Bill which would make it
clear that conducting an abortion on the grounds that the unborn
child is a girl – or a boy (although this practice mainly affects girls) is
illegal.
Seventy-three
MPs signed the amendment to the Serious Crime Bill yesterday and more have
added their names today.
If selected for
debate in the House of Commons at the next legislative stage of the Serious
Crime Bill, which is likely to be within the next two to three weeks, the
amendment will be voted on and, if ratified by a majority of MPs, it will
become law.
Fiona Bruce MP said: “The
amendment has two aims. Firstly, to make the Government to think of ways to
support women who are under pressure to abort on grounds of the sex of their
baby. Secondly, to stop this practice by confirming, beyond doubt, the current
law. This clarification is necessary to prevent false information being
distributed to women- still today, BPAS, Britain’s biggest abortion provider, on
their website, insists that sex-selective abortion is not illegal – and this despite
my Ten Minute Rule Bill of last November when MPs voted 181 to 1 that it is indeed
illegal.”
“Evidence from women shows this is still
happening and so stronger legislative force is needed – hence my amendment to the
Serious Crime Bill. I am delighted that so many MPs are supporting it to send
out such a clear message that this practice must stop. If we condemn this in
countries like China where it has produced such an imbalance in young people
that villages can have 30 young men to one young woman- whilst no-one is saying
that the extent of the practice here is at anything like that level- it is
happening here and it is equally wrong. I cannot be allowed to become
culturally acceptable and we should no longer be turning a blind eye to it.”
Rani Bilkhu, founder of Jeena
International, and spokeswoman for StopGendercide.org, said: “The
Government has been clear that sex-selective abortion is illegal. But the UK’s
biggest abortion provider BPAS continues to contradict them. It has been very
upsetting to see some people claim that there is no evidence of sex-selective
abortion in the UK. We know it is happening because we have been continually
supporting women for nearly a decade who have had them or are being forced or
coerced in having them. In their desperation to oppose this initiative, some
radical commentators have said that there is no way to help women like those we
deal with except through racial profiling.
“This is nonsense, and if the same
argument were made about FGM and forced marriages, people would run a mile. We
know sex-selective abortions are happening in the UK and the time has come to
face up to it. People speak about choice. The women who we deal with rarely
have a choice. Many are forced or coerced to abort simply because they are
girls, this is the first act of violence against women and girls. We are
supporting Fiona Bruce and her colleagues because it is the right approach,
making a clear statement about the law, and providing the means for the
Government to take practical action and to send a clear message to all
stakeholders including communities that practice sex selection abortions is not
only acceptable but against the law.”
Fiona Bruce’s Ten Minute Rule Speech, 4th
November 2014
Fiona Bruce’s Article in The Daily
Telegraph, 22nd January 2015
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11362379/Gender-abortion-Its-time-for-urgent-action.html
** A change has been made to the second paragraph on this release as the wording originally used has been interpreted as implying that women seeking a sex selective abortion would be breaking the law under this amendment. This is emphatically not the case, and has never been the intention of the amendment. Thanks to BPAS for pointing this out!
** A change has been made to the second paragraph on this release as the wording originally used has been interpreted as implying that women seeking a sex selective abortion would be breaking the law under this amendment. This is emphatically not the case, and has never been the intention of the amendment. Thanks to BPAS for pointing this out!